E-democracy is a combination of the words electronic
and democracy, also known as digital democracy or Internet democracy, incorporates 21st-century information
and communications technology to promote democracy. It is a form of government
in which all citizens are presumed to be eligible to participate equally
in the proposal, development, and creation of laws. E-democracy encompasses
social, economic and cultural conditions that enable the free and equal
practice of political self-determination of expanding
democracy.
Types of E-democracy
·
Representative
democracy
The
radical shift from representative government to internet-mediated direct
democracy is not likely. However, a "hybrid model" that uses the
internet to allow for greater government transparency and community
participation in decision-making is on the horizon. Committee selection, local
town and city decisions, and otherwise people-centric decisions would be more
easily facilitated. The principles of democracy are not changing so much as the
tools used to uphold them. E-democracy would not be a means to implement direct
democracy, but rather a tool to enable more participatory democracy as it
exists now.
·
Electronic
direct democracy
Proponents
of E-democracy sometimes envision a transition from a representative democracy
to a direct democracy carried out through technological means, and see this
transition as an end goal of e-democracy. In an Electronic Direct Democracy (EDD)
(also known as open source governance or collaborative governance), the people
are directly involved in the legislative function by electronic means. Citizens
electronically vote on legislation, author new legislation, and recall
representatives (if any representatives are preserved).
·
Liquid
democracy
Liquid
democracy or direct democracy with delegable proxy would allow citizens to
choose a proxy to vote on their behalf while retaining the right to cast their
own vote on legislation. The voting and the appointment of proxies could be
done electronically. Taking this further, the proxies could form proxy chain,
in which if A appoints B and B appoints C, and neither A nor B vote on a
proposed bill but C does, C's vote will count for all three of them. Citizens
could also rank their proxies in order of preference, so that if their first
choice proxy fails to vote, their vote can be cast by their second-choice proxy.
· Wiki democracy
One proposed form of e-democracy
is "wiki democracy", with a government legislature whose codex of
laws was an editable wiki, like Wikipedia. J Manuel Feliz-Teixeira believes we
have the resources to implement wiki democracy today. He envisions a
wiki-system in which there would be three wings of legislative, executive and
judiciary roles for which every citizen could have a voice with free access to
the wiki and a personal ID to continuously reform policies until the last day
of December (when all votes would be counted). Advantages to wiki democracy
include a no-cost system with the removal of elections, no need for parliament
or representatives because citizens directly represent themselves, and ease of
access to voice one's opinion. However, there are obstacles, uncertainties and
disagreements. First, the digital divide and low quality of education can be
deterrents to achieve the full potential of a wiki democracy. Similarly, there
is a diffusion of innovation in response to new technologies in which some
people readily adopt novel ways and others at the opposite end of the spectrum
reject them or are slow to adapt. It is also uncertain how secure this type of
democracy would be because we would have to trust that the system administrator
would have a high level of integrity to protect the votes saved to the public
domain. Lastly, Peter Levine agrees that wiki democracy would increase
discussion on political and moral issues, but he disagrees with Feliz-Teixeira
who argues that wiki democracy would remove the need for representatives and
formal governmental structures.
BY FUMBUKA
SEIF S
42554 BAPRM
III
No comments:
Post a Comment