The globalization concept has
reawakened public awareness of a corporation’s purpose. These events have
revealed strong differences and opinion about the role of business in society
and how it links to the stated purpose of corporations. The current societal
need of information is also leading corporate decision makers to be of digital
consideration.
Companies articulate and
communicate on corporate purpose with the ultimate aim of building and
sustaining reputation and trust. Managers have good reason to view this
proposition as a double-edged sword. On the one hand, more thoughtful and
careful communication of corporate purpose gives the opportunity to build,
sustain and increase trust. On the other hand, some managers feel it can open
the door to still more stakeholder mistrust and skepticism. Clearly the idea of
not only walking the talk, but talking the walk consistently and coherently is
the only way around this conundrum. This is no easy proposition, but the
rewards, in terms of reputation and brand benefits, are potentially rich.
In interviews, leading companies
stated that they are not positioning financial performance in their
communications as an end in itself, but as a means to an end. Interestingly,
they also claim that the of leading companies efforts in communicating
corporate purpose is dedicated to communicating on issues that help companies
to align their corporate interests with those of key internal and external constituencies.
Customer-focused messages also take up a good share of efforts. But viewing the
literature and discourse around this subject, companies still have to be
careful that “talk” matches “walk”. Otherwise, a substantial reputational risk
factor enters the equation.
Overall, we found a positive
correlation between effective communication of corporate purpose and financial
performance. The effect of corporate purpose on financial performance of many
companies was statistically tested through regression analysis and the results
show that communicating purpose in a way that is consistent with corporate
action can boost differentiation, strengthen reputation risk management and
build additional competitive advantage.
Whilst one can be cynical about
this, pointing to the “chicken and egg” conundrum (the view that financially
successful companies do most things better anyway), we tried to counter this
view by taking time effects into consideration to build a regression model that
only measures the effect of purpose on financial performance.
Companies in the banking,
insurance, logistics and automotive sectors have been struggling to communicate
purpose in an effective way, with the exception of financial issues.
The food and beverage sector
have the most uneven playfield in purpose communication, followed very closely
by group companies, its competitors are having a very hard time in building and
sustaining reputation and trust. Interestingly, food and beverage is the sector
in which purpose have the strongest influence on financial performance from
which all other communication’s trust is built. The corporate information system should be people's oriented and the center of reliable and trustworthy information.
By Mwasandube Aden A
BAPRM III 42638
No comments:
Post a Comment